Revised By-Law controversy

In spite of the fact that the board has stated that a judge has somehow approved them (even though the board has yet to give any important information out concerning the Mancini trial, a trial the members have paid for, request have been made but the board refuses to divulge any information, even though those records are the property of the membership).

I think the judge was not given the Original Governing Documents (OGDs).

Also possible he only approved the one by law that was an amendment and did not necessarily approve the by-laws as a whole. But again, the fake board will not give out any information. The exact statement from the judge as to what laws or rules that support his decision must be released by the board because it certainly was not based on the law and the Hawaii Revised Statutes or the KGE governing documents or those by-laws would have been declared invalid. I have proven that in my letter of dispute.

 The HRS mandates that any by laws that are inconsistent or not supported by any law and can only be amended one at a time and must have a 2/3 membership vote by the entire membership are to be valid.

  • The fact remains that The Board unlawfully rewrote the **entire set** of By-Laws with many inconsistencies, unsupported by law, and voted on it by new members who did not know what they were actually voting for and were not duly elected. All these actions were unlawfully taken.

  Those by laws were illegally produced and then approved unlawfully by the board, alone,..

KGE rules and state law both demand that any new by laws must be consistent and not in conflict with any laws. And receive a 2/3 vote by the entire membership. Not just the board.

Those by laws remove your owner rights, add unlawful extra fees and limit your right to access common property, all unlawfully approved by the board disregarding the required 2/3  entire membership vote.

.

The new KGE revised by laws are mostly inconsistent with the law and the Hawaii Revised Statutes and the original KGE Governing documents of 1975.

They are a direct violation of the original financial and governance structure and illegally strip members of fundamental rights, (voting, proxy, attending meetings, serving on the board) for non-payment.

This represents an illegal forfeiture.

The special fees for mail box are also illegally adopted by the board alone.

Anyone who disagrees with this dispute and believes they can refute the laws and rules that have been presented should immediately contact me and be prepared to present any evidence that could disprove the substantiating evidence given in the” By law dispute”.

We need to get this thing over with, if no one can prove me wrong than we need to move on to a more normalized with simple running and operating procedures through legal means. Like getting a legal third-party CPA accountant.